Talk:Klarner-Rado sequence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Responded to Nigel. |
Agree with Purefox on the millionth element and some comments on the 10 millionth |
||
Line 4:
:Your figure of 52,102,239 is the 963,815th element. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
:The other samples that go to the millionth element also show it as 54,381,285. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 13:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
BTW, I just used a "bit-vector" as suggested by the Julia sample and it would seem that you need around 1.1 billion bits (137 500 000 bytes) to find the 10 millionth element, which I think is 1,031,926,801.
<br>
The final element below 1.1 billion is element 10,543,878 which appears to be 1,099,640,002. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 13:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 13:24, 19 August 2022
Is there an authoritative source for the value of the 1 millionth item in the sequence. My computer is telling me it is 52,102,239. It is not often wrong.--Nigel Galloway (talk) 10:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- I can't find any independent confirmation of the value of the 1 millionth term but, FWIW, I'm as sure as I can be that it's 54,381,285. I just tried running the Wren example to a limit of 1.2 million to make sure there was nothing unexpected going on here but still got the same answer for the millionth.
- The other samples that go to the millionth element also show it as 54,381,285. --Tigerofdarkness (talk) 13:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
BTW, I just used a "bit-vector" as suggested by the Julia sample and it would seem that you need around 1.1 billion bits (137 500 000 bytes) to find the 10 millionth element, which I think is 1,031,926,801.
The final element below 1.1 billion is element 10,543,878 which appears to be 1,099,640,002. --Tigerofdarkness (talk) 13:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)