Talk:Klarner-Rado sequence: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Value of the 1 millionth item) |
(Responded to Nigel.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there an authoritative source for the value of the 1 millionth item in the sequence. My computer is telling me it is 52,102,239. It is not often wrong.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 10:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC) |
Is there an authoritative source for the value of the 1 millionth item in the sequence. My computer is telling me it is 52,102,239. It is not often wrong.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 10:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
:I can't find any independent confirmation of the value of the 1 millionth term but, FWIW, I'm as sure as I can be that it's 54,381,285. I just tried running the Wren example to a limit of 1.2 million to make sure there was nothing unexpected going on here but still got the same answer for the millionth. |
|||
:Your figure of 52,102,239 is the 963,815th element. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:46, 19 August 2022
Is there an authoritative source for the value of the 1 millionth item in the sequence. My computer is telling me it is 52,102,239. It is not often wrong.--Nigel Galloway (talk) 10:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- I can't find any independent confirmation of the value of the 1 millionth term but, FWIW, I'm as sure as I can be that it's 54,381,285. I just tried running the Wren example to a limit of 1.2 million to make sure there was nothing unexpected going on here but still got the same answer for the millionth.