Talk:Roots of unity: Difference between revisions
m added a section header to the first topic to properly place the table-of-contents (TOC) --- (this happens more often than one would think). |
m added a talk section, corrected a misspelling. |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Seed7 output == |
== Seed7 output == |
||
I think the Seed7 output has its real and imaginary parts reversed. (1.000*i)<sup>2</sup> is -1 not 1. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 07:14, 21 January 2008 (MST) |
I think the Seed7 output has its real and imaginary parts reversed. (1.000*i)<sup>2</sup> is -1 not 1. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 07:14, 21 January 2008 (MST) |
||
Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
(well in Algol68 it seems to be an i with an underscore which IIRC is a different alphabet). |
(well in Algol68 it seems to be an i with an underscore which IIRC is a different alphabet). |
||
The output of -0.5000i+0.8660 means -0.5000+i*0.8660 which might be counter intuitive. |
The output of -0.5000i+0.8660 means -0.5000+i*0.8660 which might be counter intuitive. |
||
I |
I chose it that way to make the 'parse' function (which converts a string to a complex) easy implementable as: |
||
<pre> |
<pre> |
||
(** |
(** |
||
Line 85: | Line 86: | ||
This function is less complicated than I thought. The sign of the imaginary part is used as separator between real and imaginary part. |
This function is less complicated than I thought. The sign of the imaginary part is used as separator between real and imaginary part. |
||
I will include this change in the next release of Seed7. After the release I will change the output of the "Roots of unity" example. [[User:Thomas Mertes|Thomas Mertes]] 06:36, 27 January 2008 (MST) |
I will include this change in the next release of Seed7. After the release I will change the output of the "Roots of unity" example. [[User:Thomas Mertes|Thomas Mertes]] 06:36, 27 January 2008 (MST) |
||
== Icon question == |
== Icon question == |
||
Line 91: | Line 93: | ||
oops :) , thanks for correcting. [[User:Rahul|Rahul]] 21:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC) |
oops :) , thanks for correcting. [[User:Rahul|Rahul]] 21:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
== number one == |
|||
You have to be odd to be number one. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:21, 17 August 2020
Seed7 output
I think the Seed7 output has its real and imaginary parts reversed. (1.000*i)2 is -1 not 1. --Mwn3d 07:14, 21 January 2008 (MST)
Seed7 uses a similar convention as Algol68: The i is the separator between real and imaginary part (well in Algol68 it seems to be an i with an underscore which IIRC is a different alphabet). The output of -0.5000i+0.8660 means -0.5000+i*0.8660 which might be counter intuitive. I chose it that way to make the 'parse' function (which converts a string to a complex) easy implementable as:
(** * Return the conversion of a string to a complex. *) const func complex: (attr complex) parse (in string: stri) is func result var complex: result is complex.value; local var integer: iPos is 0; begin iPos := pos(stri, 'i'); # Find the position of the i if iPos <> 0 then result.re := float parse (stri[.. pred(iPos)]); result.im := float parse (stri[succ(iPos) ..]); else raise RANGE_ERROR; end if; end func;
Maybe you have suggestions of how the output of a complex number should look like. If I write a complex number as -0.5000+i*0.8660 the 'parse' function could be:
(** * Return the conversion of a string to a complex. *) const func complex: (attr complex) parse (in string: stri) is func result var complex: result is complex.value; local var integer: iPos is 0; begin iPos := pos(stri, 'i'); # Find the position of the i if iPos > 1 then result.re := float parse (stri[.. iPos - 2]); result.im := float parse (stri[iPos + 2 ..]); if stri[pred(iPos)] = '-' then result.im := -result.im; elsif stri[pred(iPos)] <> '-' then raise RANGE_ERROR; end if; if stri[succ(iPos) len 1] <> "*" then raise RANGE_ERROR; end if; else raise RANGE_ERROR; end if; end func;
What do you think? Thomas Mertes 09:35, 21 January 2008 (MST)
- Whatever is easier is fine as long as other people can figure it out. Maybe the output should explained a bit in the example. --Mwn3d 09:52, 21 January 2008 (MST)
- I have reconsidered the issue aggain. The output format of a complex number should be self-explanatory. Your question showed me that my solution was counter intuitive. Now I think that writing a complex number as -0.5000+0.8660i would be the least confusing solution. This is also the mathematical notation and the format used by perl and similar to the format used in some other languages.
The Seed7 'parse' function to convert a string in the format -0.5000+0.8660i to a complex would be:
(** * Return the conversion of a string to a complex. *) const func complex: (attr complex) parse (in string: stri) is func result var complex: result is complex.value; local var integer: pos is 0; var integer: pos2 is 0; begin pos := rpos(stri, '+'); pos2 := rpos(stri, '-'); if pos2 > pos then pos := pos2; end if; if pos <> 0 and stri[length(stri)] = 'i' then result.re := float parse (stri[.. pred(pos)]); result.im := float parse (stri[pos .. pred(length(stri))]); else raise RANGE_ERROR; end if; end func;
This function is less complicated than I thought. The sign of the imaginary part is used as separator between real and imaginary part. I will include this change in the next release of Seed7. After the release I will change the output of the "Roots of unity" example. Thomas Mertes 06:36, 27 January 2008 (MST)
Icon question
Is the parameter n to the procedure str_rep used? It's not an Icon secret is it? --Mwn3d 21:30, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
oops :) , thanks for correcting. Rahul 21:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
number one
You have to be odd to be number one. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 18:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)