User talk:Caiovr60: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(→‎thanks: new section)
(→‎colored keywords: new section)
Line 18: Line 18:


thanks to dchapes for his precious suggestions!
thanks to dchapes for his precious suggestions!

== colored keywords ==

I note that in some languages source code (Quick Basic/Qbasic for example) the syntactic elements are marked with different colors: how can I do this?
Thanks
Claudio Larini

Revision as of 15:27, 5 December 2014

Hi, you have overwritten the Erlang entry, could you put it back please. Trabb Pardo–Knuth algorithm. --Paddy3118 (talk) 17:45, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Accidental Erlang section removal

I noticed your IRC message about accidentally removing the Erlang section from the Trabb Pardo–Knuth algorithm task and I restored it for you. Depending on the amount of editing done you can do this yourself by using the undo link on the history page or by using the history page to find the last good copy of the section to be restored, and then going to the editor with that old copy just to copy out the raw text of the section to paste into the latest version (I did the later).

The method I use when adding a new section to a task is to start by editing the section immediately following (or preceding) and then inserting a new {{header|Go}} header at the top (or bottom). I also edit the default "Summary:" line to have /* {{header|Go}} */ instead of whatever header I started to edit. Finally, I use the Show changes button before saving to verify that I'm only adding lines and not changing/removing any.

At any rate, it's not a big deal as long as the errant edits get fixed. Welcome to RosettaCode!

dchapes (talk | contribs) 17:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

thanks

thanks to dchapes for his precious suggestions!

colored keywords

I note that in some languages source code (Quick Basic/Qbasic for example) the syntactic elements are marked with different colors: how can I do this? Thanks Claudio Larini