User talk:Craigd: Difference between revisions
Response |
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Thank you! —[[User:Dchapes|Dchapes]] ([[User talk:Dchapes|talk]]) 16:54, 2 September 2014 (UTC) |
Thank you! —[[User:Dchapes|Dchapes]] ([[User talk:Dchapes|talk]]) 16:54, 2 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Apologies - I assume this note is in response to my rash of updates to my code yesterday. Yes, I always use edit section and when I add a section, I tag the edit with "zkl". As I usually edit a section to add a new one, I had gotten in the habit of removing the default check in summary. Sorry for the brain fade. |
:Apologies - I assume this note is in response to my rash of updates to my code yesterday. Yes, I always use edit section and when I add a section, I tag the edit with "zkl". As I usually edit a section to add a new one, I had gotten in the habit of removing the default check in summary. Sorry for the brain fade. |
||
::No need to apologize, I'm the one nitpicking and asking for something :). Thanks. —[[User:Dchapes|Dchapes]] ([[User talk:Dchapes|talk]]) 21:53, 2 September 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:53, 2 September 2014
Hi Craigd, welcome to RC and thanks for your support with those great zkl language entries!
You might want to create your User page; (just look at others and follow what they do for things like the table of language proficiency). --Paddy3118 (talk) 07:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Section/language name in change summary (or Edit by Section)
I don't wish to be too pedantic or to discourage your continued fine wiki edits… however:
If you're not already editing by section (using the per section "[edit]" links, enabled by default from your preferences page) could I ask that you do so? If you are already doing this, could I ask that you leave the "/* {{header|zkl}} */ " text at the start of the change summary alone (adding more descriptive text after it).
In addition to pre-filling the change summary, editing by section has other benefits. For one, the preview and change windows are limited just to the relevant section making it easier to work with. But more importantly, the wiki back-end can better handle multiple people making simultaneous changes to different sections if they each do section edits rather than whole page edits.
If for some reason, editing by section doesn't work for you or is otherwise undesirable for you, could I instead ask that you prefix your change summaries with the section name you're editing? Just something like "zkl:" would be sufficient. It can be difficult/confusing to look through the recent changes or per-page history and identify at a glance what is being changed without such things.
Thank you! —Dchapes (talk) 16:54, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- Apologies - I assume this note is in response to my rash of updates to my code yesterday. Yes, I always use edit section and when I add a section, I tag the edit with "zkl". As I usually edit a section to add a new one, I had gotten in the habit of removing the default check in summary. Sorry for the brain fade.